Politics from North of the 49th Parallel
Pentagon Approved Use of Black Ops Interrogation Methods in Iraq
Published on May 16, 2004 By IanGillespie In Politics

Sy Hersh blows the Abu Ghraib prison torture story wide open.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen Cambone approved a black ops interrogation program to used in Iraqi prisons -- a program originally designed for use against high-level Al Qaida terrorists:

"The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfeld’s decision embittered the American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite combat units, and hurt America’s prospects in the war on terror...."

The fateful decision was provoked by the Iraqi insurgency:

"In the first months after the fall of Baghdad, Rumsfeld and his aides still had a limited view of the insurgency, seeing it as little more than the work of Baathist “dead-enders,” criminal gangs, and foreign terrorists who were Al Qaeda followers.... Then, in August, 2003, terror bombings in Baghdad hit the Jordanian Embassy, killing nineteen people, and the United Nations headquarters, killing twenty-three people, including Sergio Vieira de Mello, the head of the U.N. mission...."

"Inside the Pentagon, there was a growing realization that the war was going badly...."

"The success of the war was at risk; something had to be done to change the dynamic...."

'[S]omething had to be done':

"The solution, endorsed by Rumsfeld and carried out by Stephen Cambone, was to get tough with those Iraqis in the Army prison system who were suspected of being insurgents. A key player was Major General Geoffrey Miller, the commander of the detention and interrogation center at Guantánamo, who had been summoned to Baghdad in late August to review prison interrogation procedures...."

"Miller’s concept, as it emerged in recent Senate hearings, was to “Gitmoize” the prison system in Iraq—to make it more focussed on interrogation. He also briefed military commanders in Iraq on the interrogation methods used in Cuba—methods that could, with special approval, include sleep deprivation, exposure to extremes of cold and heat, and placing prisoners in “stress positions” for agonizing lengths of time...."

'[A] step further':

"Rumsfeld and Cambone went a step further, however: they expanded the scope of the sap [special access program], bringing its unconventional methods to Abu Ghraib. The commandos were to operate in Iraq as they had in Afghanistan. The male prisoners could be treated roughly, and exposed to sexual humiliation."

"'They weren’t getting anything substantive from the detainees in Iraq,' the former intelligence official told me. 'No names. Nothing that they could hang their hat on. Cambone says, I’ve got to crack this thing and I’m tired of working through the normal chain of command. I’ve got this apparatus set up -- the black special-access program -- and I’m going in hot. So he pulls the switch, and the electricity begins flowing last summer. And it’s working. We’re getting a picture of the insurgency in Iraq and the intelligence is flowing into the white world. We’re getting good stuff. But we’ve got more targets' -- prisoners in Iraqi jails -- 'than people who can handle them.'"

"Cambone then made another crucial decision, the former intelligence official told me: not only would he bring the sap’s rules into the prisons; he would bring some of the Army military-intelligence officers working inside the Iraqi prisons under the sap’s auspices. 'So here are fundamentally good soldiers—military-intelligence guys—being told that no rules apply,' the former official, who has extensive knowledge of the special-access programs, added. 'And, as far as they’re concerned, this is a covert operation, and it’s to be kept within Defense Department channels.'"


Comments
on May 16, 2004
remember back a couple weeks when we were being so sagely cautioned about coming to any sort of conclusion about abu gjurayb because it was premature to hop on the anti-american bandwagon?

ill be damned if they werent right for all the wrong reasons

if i sound a bit smug please know it has nothing at all to do with the facts or the reality of this situation. that it could have happened at all is nothing short of terrible. that it should have happened the way hersh reports (he's never been far off as far back as i can recall) it horrific.
on May 16, 2004
Well said, sadly I do not think we have seen the end of the lies and cover-ups. Though I am a firm believer that truth will out...even from an administration as obsessively secretive as this one.
on May 17, 2004
While this report may be true it doesn't provide any proof that Rumsfeld endorsed torture or knew exactly what was going on. It just suggests a plausible series of events in which it may have happened. Very different and not enough to convict him. Innoncent till proven guilty.

Paul.